35 days and counting: Sacramento Kaiser’s essential workers are battling to keep their pensions

Members of Sacramento's Local 39 on their 33rd day of striking. Photograph by Scott Thomas Anderson

By Scott Thomas Anderson

In a moment of extreme uncertainty, as panic began gripping the region, the clinical technicians, stationary engineers and bio-medical engineers of Local 39 were told they needed to act quickly: COVID-19’s arrival in Northern California was prompting Kaiser Permanente hospitals around Sacramento to change their layouts as they braced for patient-overloads. It would be up to the members of Local 39 to make it happen. And as Kaiser’s emergency rooms and special wings started filling with COVID-infected people, the members of Local 39 weren’t going anywhere. They’re not a “tele-commute” kind of worker – they’re literally the ones keeping the blood pressure monitors, EKGs, CT scanners and MRI machines running 24-7.

“My crew has been here through the heat of it,” said Randy Newell, a 39-year veteran of the union. “We supported all the operations. We had operating rooms we had to turn into COVID diagnostic rooms, which is a monumental thing to do. And our engineers here, we go in those COVID rooms. We expose ourselves every time.”

He added, “We’re the heartbeat of the whole place. If we don’t do our job, nobody else in there can do their job. We’re the first line of defense, really.” 

Despite their ever-stalwart work during the pandemic, Local 39 members recently discovered Kaiser is trying to phase out their pension plan. It takes six years of training to become one of Local 39’s fully qualified stationary engineers, and a decade to reach a journeyman level of expertise. That’s the equivalent of a bachelor’s and master’s degree, and longer than it takes to become a certified nurse in California. Nevertheless, Kaiser Permanente wants to switch these highly-trained workers from a long-term, ‘defined benefit’ pension plan to a lesser, 401(k)-style ‘defined contribution’ retirement plan. Local 39 says Kaiser is essentially trying to “freeze” its members’ pensions, opting instead for 1% pre-taxed bonuses every year.

Kaiser’s aim mirrors a larger, four-decade trend of million and billion dollar employers steering away from providing long-term, genuinely livable pensions, and shifting to less-expensive systems that put the stress of saving and investing for retirement – and a plan’s overall liability – squarely on the shoulders of workers. 

Local 39 says it tried to negotiate with Kaiser beginning in June, but the sticking point of the pension – something workers at several massive companies across the U.S. are suddenly drawing the line on – caused talks with the health care giant to ultimately break down.

When members made it clear they wouldn’t sign on Sept. 17, they were told to hand in their keys and work phones. They went on strike the next morning. They’ve been standing in front of Kaiser’s Sacramento-area hospitals ever since. Sometimes they’ve had the blinding sun in their eyes on 97-degree afternoons. Other times they’ve been walking with signs on bitterly cold mornings. Now, the rains are coming.

For members of Local 39, the fight for their future goes on.

“I’ve been with Kaiser for 24 years, and I came here because it was a career with stability, longevity, health, retirement – the whole nine yards,” said union member Dustin Powell. “Now they’re threatening to take the pension from us, and pull it right out from under our feet. After 24 years, they just want it to die on the vine.”

Local 39’s cadre of members are not the only ones striking to defend pensions at the moment. More than 10,000 workers in Iowa, Illinois and Kansas have been on the picket lines of multi-billion-dollar farming equipment manufacturer John Deere since mid-October. Among the reported reasons for that strike is John Deere’s insistence on eliminating pension plans for newer employees. The assault on solid pension plans has been accelerating since 2006, when computer giant IBM abandoned its in favor of a lower-grade 401(k)-style retirement offering. Major companies like Motorola, Verizon Wireless and Lockheed Martin have since followed suit.

This trend, which critics say is a canary in the coal mine for eliminating America’s middle-class, is something Kaiser Permanente was willing to defend when Local 39 walked out the door Sept. 18.

“We are seeking no takeaways in our contract proposal with Local 39,” Kaiser said in an official statement. “We are offering wage increases and bonuses that would provide employees with an average of $3,600 more each year. This would keep our operating engineers among the best compensated in their profession and continue to ensure that we attract and retain the most highly skilled professionals. However, in the midst of an economic downturn where people are struggling to keep their health care, the union is demanding increases that would make it even more difficult for us to keep health care affordable for our members.”

Kaiser’s statement also mentioned that Local 39 members have a pension plan, but it did not mention freezing or phasing out that plan. For union members on the picket line, that’s telling. So too are news reports that Kaiser has, in recent years, been paying its CEOs upwards of $16 million-a-year to run its nonprofit hospital system.

In the meantime, Kaiser has reportedly contracted with A.C.C.O. to maintain its vital medical gear and equipment: A.C.C.O. is an engineering systems company largely known for maintaining government buildings in Elk Grove and Placer County. Local 39 is not impressed.

“I think it’s disingenuous for Kaiser to put out these statements about how they’ve been prepared for the strike and hired capable people to come,” Newell said. “I can tell you that the contractors who are in there right now are not capable of doing the job we do. I’m sure they can fix an ice machine.”

Newell stressed his members would never have endured 35 days of being outside if they didn’t think the stakes were extremely high.

“There’s been a lot of talk through many decades now about different industries losing their pensions altogether,” he stressed. “With the sea changes in our society in the United States, over the last several years, we’re getting treated as if we were billionaires not putting out our fair share. I would want America to know that ‘defined contribution’ is the problem … I don’t know if they picked on us because we’re smaller; but we are the only ones left with a pension plan.”

Our content is free, but not free to produce

If you value our local news, arts and entertainment coverage, become an SN&R supporter with a one-time or recurring donation. Help us keep our reporters at work, bringing you the stories that need to be told.


Stay Updated

For the latest local news, arts and entertainment, sign up for our newsletter.
We'll tell you the story behind the story.

7 Comments on "35 days and counting: Sacramento Kaiser’s essential workers are battling to keep their pensions"

  1. Thank you for supporting this very worthy cause. Please note that Local 39 employs over 800 employees in N.Ca. Eight hundred families just completed five weeks with no compensation. There is no government assistance and union members are threatened with their jobs if they leave the strike line. As of 10/22, Kaiser has not made any attempt to negotiate. My heart goes out to us 800 families who are facing severe financial hardship after putting our lives on the line everyday during the midst of the COVID epidemic in belief that we were working for a supportive and loyal employer.

  2. This is making me seriously considering leaving Kaiser as my health care provider. While making record profit’s and paying higher ups bloated salaries how can I justify stripping retirements.

  3. Hang in there people my heart goes out for everyone of you. It is a shame that those high ranking personal in their 298 million dollar building and making their seven to eight figure salaries are not in touch with the real world you know the dedicated employees that saw through this last crisis and in a heartbeat would see another one through I only wonder what Mr Kaiser would think of what these greedy people are doing to his legacy and how many members will turn away from signing up and going to Kaiser’s competition solely on how Kaiser is treating it’s employees

  4. Concerned in Sac | October 28, 2021 at 8:24 am | Reply

    Pension Plans Need Reform

    This article doesn’t go into the trade-offs for the providers. What about the high cost of providing pensions for providers or the problems with providers assuming all the risks of pensions? Pensions are guaranteed funds paid out to the retiree for the rest of their life. But they cannot be passed on to kids/beneficiaries (their surviving spouse can usually continue to receive payments until he/she dies). No matter what happens in the market. What if the investments don’t pan out? What if the US economy tanks? The employer/pension provider is on the hook.

    In contrast, the 401k is a widely accepted retirement option where the risk of the market is assumed by the employee. And the employee’s retirement money belongs to them even after they die—they get to pass it on to their beneficiaries.

    Now I don’t understand if what the employees are being offered is competitive or not. But presenting this as 401ks being obviously not as good as a pension is missing the total picture.

  5. Looking for balanced and realistic retirement programs

    When the state of CA talked about shifting from a guaranteed pay retirement to a 401(k) model taxpayers rallied to the side of management complaining they were shouldering a more generous (and outdated) retirement program for state employees than individual citizens could access in their employment situations. Ditto for school districts, county, and other public entities. As a state employee I bristled at the notion of changing the rules I was hired under. Most employees anywhere would. On the other hand, citizens will have to foot the bill and/or take lower service levels to maintain fixed payout, under-funded retirement programs. Whether we like it or not, if any group wants a bigger slice of the pie, someone has to get less or the pie has to grow. A go-forward approach that makes different rules apply based on date of hire is sound as a mitigating strategy. I understand Labor hating the idea but as a Kaiser member, Im like the disgruntled taxpayer: should my rates keep going up to maintain the generous retirement programs for one slice of the employee base? And why aren’t nurses, housekeepers, clerks and other represented groups supporting this strike?

    Disregarding rumors of industrial sabotage of critical systems, are all these workers sure their jobs cant be outsourced?

  6. I support this strike and I can not believe these people are being treated like this after they risked their own health and lives and their family to save other people from dyeing and this is how they are payed back by changing their pension plan for the worse out of nothing more than greed for their own gain and if I was anyone that used Kaiser as my health provider I would change because if they would do this to their own employs think how they might do you when you need them during a personal medical crisis trust me as a 13 year stage 4 cancer survivor I know what I’m talking about because I have good health insurance that was with me all the way are I wouldn’t be here today I also have a personal Freind that is out there striking in Northern California Bill who is one of the most stand up people I ever new and he is a true family man that loves his wife and kids and doesn’t deserve this at all!

  7. Karen Sutton IFPTE Local 20 Kaiser Employee | October 31, 2021 at 12:58 am | Reply

    “And why aren’t nurses, housekeepers, clerks and other represented groups supporting this strike?” The support is there!! And not just in California. All The unions going into Kaiser contract negotiations are facing the same proposals. All are rejecting the terms as unacceptable. Strike votes are the latest result to Kaisers unwillingness to bargain in good faith with these other unions. The Engineers are the tip of the Iceberg. Solidarity among the Unions is Strong on what is acceptable to bring to the table. Even Unions that are not up for bargaining are supporting this stance. To all the engineers- Hang in there you are the front runners for all of us!!!!!

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.