Panel won’t ban coyote-killing contests around the Sierra

Photograph by Abbie Chohrach

By Carol Schaye

Coyote-killing contests will continue in Nevada after the state’s Wildlife Commission narrowly voted against banning the contests.

Proponents say the wildlife-killing contests — in which participants shoot as many coyotes as they can find in order to win awards and other prizes – assist in wildlife conservation efforts. Those in favor of a ban say the competitions are a barbaric practice that harms the viability of the species.

The Nevada Board of Wildlife Commissioners defeated the proposal for a ban by a 5-4 vote on Nov. 5. The regulation would have prohibited organizing, promoting or participating in contests or other competitions to capture or kill coyotes or other predatory or furbearing animals.

Contests are ‘frivolous killing’

Photograph by Joshua Wilking

Commissioner Tiffany East said that at least one Nevada lawmaker has vowed to bring the issue to the Nevada Legislature if the wildlife board failed to impose a ban. At the recent meeting, some commissioners said they suspect lawmakers also may consider changing the composition of the panel, which is composed of seven hunters and two non-hunting members of the public.

East, along with commissioners Dave McNich, Alana Wise and Jon Almberg voted in favor of the ban. Commissioners Shane Rogers, Casey Kiel, Tom Barnes, Tommy Caviglia and Ron Pierini voted against the proposal.

At the meeting, Tony Wasley, director of the Nevada Department of Wildlife , spoke in favor of ending the killing contests. Wasley noted that he is a hunter, but that Nevada’s wildlife belongs to all citizens of the state” and that “hunters are the extreme minority in Nevada.”

Wasley cited the North American Model of Wildlife Conservation’s position that “contests are frivolous killing.” He said the panel also should consider public opinion, which tends to oppose such contests.

In Nevada, coyotes are considered pests and may be killed on sight without regard to hunting seasons. Ranchers and rural residents say they kill the predators to protect cattle, deer herds and farm animals and pets.

“I fully support people protecting their livestock, their pets, their family. … I just disagree that the best way to do it is through these contests,” Wasley said. “It’s not the act of killing the coyotes that bothers me, it’s how it’s done.”

Commissioner Wise agreed. “What the public wants, and it has become clear, most people don’t want these contests and hunting coyotes will not be affected by banning the contests,” she said.

A culture clash

Photograph by Casey Horner

Still, proponents of continuing the competitions considered the proposed ban as the beginning of a a slippery slope to restricting or banning other types of hunting or fishing, including fishing contests. In addition, they argue, the contests have become a traditional social event in rural areas.

The panel’s failure to end the contests drew fire from some wildlife conservation advocates.

“This is an outrage, especially since the public overwhelmingly opposes these terrible contests,” said Patrick Donnelly, Nevada state director at the Center for Biological Diversity. “The commissioners are supposed to safeguard Nevada’s wildlife, but they succumbed to the desires of a handful of sick individuals who get pleasure from indiscriminately slaughtering animals”

Donnelly noted that the wildlife department’s own scientists expressed opposition to the contests, but the commission overrode them.

“The commission, mostly composed of white men who hunt, is not representative of Nevadans,” Donnelly said. “The legislature needs to strongly consider overhauling the composition of the commission, or abolishing it altogether and giving management authority to the Department of Wildlife.

Prohibitions elsewhere

Photograph by Ben Mater

California outlawed coyote-killing contests in 2014. Since then, Arizona, Colorado, Massachusetts, New Mexico and Vermont have passed bans on killing contests for coyotes, foxes, bobcats and other species. Washington state and Oregon also are considering banning the contests.

In 2015, Nevada’s wildlife commission considered a public petition to end the contests but dismissed the petition as incomplete. A more specific petition resurfaced later that year, but failed to pass. The following year, some of the commissioners wrote a draft policy, but it wasn’t a binding regulation. In 2019, a bill to ban the contests made it to a state senate committee, but died there.

Our content is free, but not free to produce

If you value our local news, arts and entertainment coverage, become an SN&R supporter with a one-time or recurring donation. Help us keep our reporters at work, bringing you the stories that need to be told.


Stay Updated

For the latest local news, arts and entertainment, sign up for our newsletter.
We'll tell you the story behind the story.

11 Comments on "Panel won’t ban coyote-killing contests around the Sierra"

  1. “It’s not the act of killing the coyotes that bothers me, it’s how it’s done,” director of the Dept. of Wildlife said. Commissioner Wise agreed, “hunting coyotes will not be affected by banning the contests,” she said. These people are all full of assurances that coyote killings will continue & they’re absolutely right. The slaughter of these free born animals for target practice kicks, regardless of contests will continue. Thanks to a crazed hatred & merciless cruelty toward an innocent animal who knows from nothing except to try to survive like each of us who’re born. Born to have to eat, crap, mate to bear young & suffer our own mortal demise.

  2. Caroline thomson | December 8, 2021 at 9:54 am | Reply

    Deplorable behaviour

  3. That’s quite a shameful legacy we allow be left to our children and grandchildren – killing as many animals as you can for prizes of money and/or guns. I didn’t realize our wildlife was for sale. The various and biased state wildlife agencies and commissions making the rules are certainly not representing the greater public. These contests are a relatively recent aberration of “hunting” and must be stopped. They serve no legitimate purpose and detract from biodiversity. Wanton waste of our wildlife… and cruel.

  4. Darienne Hetherman | December 8, 2021 at 9:49 pm | Reply

    Killing contests are deranged, vulgar, unconscionably cruel, and must be outlawed. They are a blight on Nevada’s reputation.

  5. It’s so barbaric and uncivilized to treat wildlife like that. Killing Contests have to be banned like in seven other states. This behavior gives to US a very bad reputation.

  6. Absolutely Cowardly So Called Hunters. Despicable and Psychopathic Behavior! SHAMEFUL!!

  7. People that pray on wildlife are sick. I hope we have leader one day that values these beautiful creatures.

  8. This is outrageous and unacceptable. It is imperative to understand the science AND the gross inhumanity of hunting and killing these highly family structured and complicated animals. We must protect and restore the balance. This decision is based on ignorance. What a disgrace.

  9. Who’s on the panel??? I would like to understand why killing these animals makes your life better.

  10. Keep fighting to endcoyote killing contests! It can be done and should be done! It’s a disgrace and there are more people against it than for it !It is time we sttop catering to the bloodthirsty hunters that only want to kill! We need to protect our wildlife! Why is it that animal cruelty laws don’t apply to them!

    • Animal cruelty laws don’t apply to wildlife for the same reason anti-cruelty laws don’t apply to factory-farmed animals or those tortured in research labs They’re all viewed as renewable resources for humans to make a buck off. Selling sport hunting licenses pays the salaries of state wildlife ‘management’ agencies & you have to have purchased a hunting license to participate in killing contests

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.