Editor’s note: Kids count, but can adults?

Kit Carson International Academy received an $8.6 million upgrade from Sacramento City Unified’s bond issues approved in 2012. The district is asking voters for $750 million more on March 3. (Photo by Foon Rhee)

Should taxpayers trust Sac City schools with more money?

Children deserve everything they need for a chance to succeed in school, including well-equipped classrooms, labs and libraries.

But what if the adults in charge are terrible at math—specifically, balancing the budget?

That’s the difficult choice facing voters March 3 on Measure H, Sacramento City Unified School District’s $750 million bond issue to upgrade classrooms, labs, libraries and technology; build career training centers; and to provide music and arts facilities.

To repay the bonds, the measure would cost property owners 5 cents per $100 of assessed value, which the district says will amount to $88 more a year for the typical homeowner and raise $35 million a year.

Measure H requires at least 55% of the vote to pass.

The district says there’s a dire need because most of its schools are more than 50 years old, don’t meet current safety and instructional standards and cost more to operate and maintain.

“The goal of Measure H is to bring older schools up to the same academic and safety standards as newer schools,” says a mailer to voters. The upgrades are needed to “support instruction that prepares students for college and in-demand careers in fields like health sciences, engineering, technology, and skilled trades.”

The district also says that approval would qualify it for about $80 million in state matching funds, and argues that other school districts in the region have made similar investments.

The measure calls for a citizens oversight committee and annual audits, and the district says no money can be used for administrator salaries or pensions.

Still, voters can’t be blamed for being skeptical about giving more tax money to a district that a state audit warns hasn’t adequately dealt with its financial crisis and is near insolvency.

The December audit was officially presented to district trustees on Feb. 6. The district sent a three-page letter on Jan. 13 to the state auditor updating its progress and plans to send a fuller report in mid-March—after the vote. The letter pointed out it is still trying to negotiate with the teachers’ union for cost savings to avoid a state takeover.

UPDATE: On Feb. 20, district trustees voted to cut 82 positions, including 54 teachers.

The bond money would be separate from the general fund, which pays for classroom instruction and teacher salaries. The district also says that projects funded by Measures Q and R—bonds totaling $414 million that were approved in 2012—are on schedule, with all but $77 million of those bonds issued.

But the measure may also be hurt because it’s on the same ballot as Proposition 13, a $15 billion statewide bond issue for K-12 schools, community colleges and public universities, plus Measure E, a $650 million bond measure for Los Rios Community College District, which would extend a 2-cent property tax levy. That’s an awful lot of borrowing to build new school and university buildings all at once.

And while new buildings would be great, how students are being taught and treated matters more. Sac City Unified has faced recent criticism for suspending black students, for not protecting bullied children and for failing students with developmental disabilities.

With those problems and with the questions about the district’s finances, it’s going to take a large leap of faith for voters to let it take on another $750 million in debt.

Our content is free, but not free to produce

If you value our local news, arts and entertainment coverage, become an SN&R supporter with a one-time or recurring donation. Help us keep our reporters at work, bringing you the stories that need to be told.

Newsletter

Stay Updated

For the latest local news, arts and entertainment, subscribe to our newsletter.
We'll tell you the story behind the story.

1 Comment on "Editor’s note: Kids count, but can adults?"

  1. This is basically a taxpayer bailout of the inept SCUSD and its greedy teachers, who cannot work together like adults to compromise and sacrifice to save the district. Both sides claim to care about the kids but their actions (or lacktherof) prove otherwise. The district stupidly gave their already well paid, well-benefitted teachers raises they knew they did not have money for, and the teachers refuse to pay for any of their expensive healthcare. Before asking for taxpayer money the teachers should agree to less expensive plans and contribute to the cost of their own healthcare; this is not unreasonable. But they did not even try to do this. If Measure H passes, we would be essentially be paying for teachers generous free healthcare and inflated wages. This mess is not about saving the kids, it is about selfish adults that refuse to compromise and face the reality of their situation.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.


*